OMG! they actually spent $1mil to revamp the site? Apparently that is what was reported on the Digital Life supplement today in the papers. Ok maybe i don’t know the scope of work involved, but still the obvious optimisation stuff are not done and i’ll just name 3.
- Nested tables 9 levels deep, meaning super long render time needed
- Rendered HTML file alone is more than 300k!!
- Super super lots of options in drop down box which takes a long time to render
I can’t look any further and don’t want to analyse anymore. This guy ran some tests and I agree with him on many issues.
I would LOVE to know who did it. If you know, pls tell me.